Migration, a Problem in Its Infancy


Counting
the dead. We’re extraordinarily good at counting the dead, we warlike nations.
Every drone-strike has its body-count and we’re pretty good at counting losses
on both sides, whichever those sides might be.

What we’re not so good at is keeping tabs on the
displaced and those whose lives have been unalterably affected by chaos. Our
boys come home, if they come home, to
dysfunctional medical and psychiatric care—a lost generation, as the women and
men of Vietnam were lost. In those far away war-zones the losses run deeper and
the damage runs closer to the bone.
Iraq was a nation run
by a ruthless dictator, no doubt. But the parks were open, the ice cream
vendors sold their wares and family life had regularity, no matter the
constrictions. Syrian children went to school and Afghan tribal communities
went about their daily lives.
All gone now, the
mirage of democracy traded off for car-bombs, suicide bombings and families
shuttered away in what’s left of their homes—listening, fearing the skies, wondering how and when and who will
next fall victim. The question is not whether they have survived, but if there’s
anything left worthwhile to live for.

So
Europe deals as best it can with the influx of those who have fled the chaos
and argues over whether they are political or economic migrants. An empty argument in a world empty of
solutions
.
A week
ago the Editorial Board of the New York
Times
made the audacious claim that “Europe
Must Do Better on Refugees
.” This from a leading newspaper in a country of
50 States, where the Governors of at least 31 of those states say they will not
accept Syrian refugees and Republicans block President Obama from accepting
even a token number. Yet, according to the Times, Europe must do better. Perhaps America might lead rather than criticize.
But if you think the
West has a ‘problem’ with five
million Syrian refugees, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
Climate
change is about to kick off world-wide migrations in the billions. Only about a third of our planet is land to begin with
and that portion is bound to shrink. If the seas rise a mere half-meter,
Bangladesh is over. Eighty million
people will have to migrate to Pakistan or India. One need only contemplate the
global shorelines to realize the nasty coincidence–that’s where populations
are both concentrated and most vulnerable.
What happens when
that occurs? What then are the options?
America
is seeing the early warnings of this, if it will only look up from its
televisions to notice. Drought and flood occurrences where they have never or
rarely been, as well as earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes wildly out-of-pattern.
At least the United States has land in which to move around.
A great proportion of
the world has no place to go.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *