Capitalism is not a Zero-Sum Game

Capitalism made America great and I’m a big
supporter if we keep certain restraints in place. But it is not, as frequently contended, a zero-sum

Zero-sum is defined in
admittedly simplified economic theory as when one entity (market-exchange,
corporation, political party or poker game) wins, another loses in equal amount. Hence the sum is zero.

Which is fine for the
stock market, where someone sells at a profit and someone else buys at a loss.
But that doesn’t happen in a steeply rising (or falling) market. In a rising
market, everyone gets a profit. But as we witnessed when the market took a dump
out behind the shed, everyone doesn’t
lose on the way down. In the recent too
big to fail
bailout, banks got paid for crap-loans and investor losses (in
large, but not all) got covered by investment banks.
The little guy (in
big numbers) lost one or more of the following: his home, job, health
insurance, car, credit-cards, sanity and/or sense of purpose. The unemployment
rate is far closer to 25-27% than the reported 5.7%.
But capitalism as we practice it today in a
consumer-driven society has a third party at the table. The consumer. They’re not thought about or considered much, but they’re
an entity as well and that’s when the zero-sum theory begins to fall apart. 
Essentially, there is no market without consumers. Pretending that the stock
market is the only market is simply a false premise. People and companies who buy things are the third leg of
capitalism. Way down at the bottom of the process, someone has to buy.
So when we look at the Dow Jones stock
average nearly doubling since 2008 and convince ourselves the economy is fine,
we’re whistling past the graveyard. Consumer spending is way down because the
average Joe on the street has had his legs kicked out from under him and simply
hasn’t the disposable income to buy stuff. He’d love to consume and in many cases needs to consume, but the dough simply isn’t available.
Wall Street is beginning to realize this:
June 20, 2013
(Bloomberg) – The Capitalist’s Case for
a $15 Minimum Wage
The fundamental law of capitalism is that if workers
have no money, businesses have no customers. That’s why the extreme, and
widening, wealth gap in our economy presents not just a moral challenge, but an
economic one, too. In a capitalist system, rising inequality creates a death
spiral of falling demand that ultimately takes everyone down.
Nick Hanauer, venture capitalist – “Traditionally,
arguments for big minimum-wage increases come from labor unions and advocates
for the poor. I make the case as a businessman and entrepreneur who sees our
millions of low-paid workers as customers to be cultivated and not as costs to
be cut. Studies by the Economic Policy Institute show that a $15 minimum wage
would directly affect 51 million workers and indirectly benefit an additional
30 million. That’s 81 million people, or about 64 percent of the workforce, and
their families who would be more able to buy cars, clothing and food from our
nation’s businesses.”
Banks are taking it on the chin as well. Bank
of America is taking a hit on defaults in mortgages, auto loans, student loans
and credit-card debt. These people don’t want
to lose their cars and homes, nor do their sons and daughters want to default on the loans that
enabled their education. But jobs at wages that can keep them afloat are simply
not there. The American economic miracle is in a death-spiral for working (and
unemployed) Americans and the entire system as we knew it in the recent past is
at risk.
Nick Hanauer again: Beware,
fellow plutocrats, the pitchforks are coming—for us
. Nick Hanauer is a rich
guy, an unrepentant capitalist — and he has something to say to his fellow
plutocrats: Wake up! Growing inequality is about to push our societies into
conditions resembling pre-revolutionary France. Hear his argument about why a
dramatic increase in minimum wage could grow the middle class, deliver economic
prosperity … watch Nick on
TED Talks.
Until we get that third leg under the stool, Capitalism
being a zero-sum game is out the window and we’re about to pay the cost of

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *