A Hundred Thousand Dead Because of Carelessness

These hundred thousand Americans that friends and family bury every
year were not killed in auto accidents. A home fire, tornado or other
unexpected disaster didn’t do them in. For one reason or another, some
as simple as a minor checkup and others as complicated as surgery, they
came home from the hospital in a coffin.

These hundred thousand Americans that friends and family bury every
year were not killed in auto accidents. A home fire, tornado or other
unexpected disaster didn’t do them in. For one reason or another, some
as simple as a minor checkup and others as complicated as surgery, they
came home from the hospital in a coffin.
This, for no arguable reason except carelessness. Carelessness, A)
The quality of not being careful or taking pains, B) Failure to act
with the prudence that a reasonable person would exercise under the
same circumstances. It’s an unforgiving word when someone dies as a
result–an incredible word when a hundred thousand die, every year.

(Kevin
Sack, NYTimes) The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
projected this year that one of every 22 patients would get an
infection while hospitalized — 1.7 million cases a year — and that
99,000 would die, often from what began as a routine procedure. The
cost of treating the infections amounts to tens of billions of dollars,
experts say.

But in the past two years, a few hospitals have
demonstrated that simple screening and isolation of patients, along
with a relentless focus on hygiene, can reduce the number of dangerous
infections. By doing so, they have fueled a national debate about
whether hospitals are doing all they can to protect patients from
infections, which are now linked to more deaths than diabetes or
Alzheimer’s disease.

Accidental hospital infection, aside from diabetes or Alzheimer’s

  • kills more Americans than alcoholism,
  • knocks off almost twice as many as car crashes,
  • amounts to three times the number of suicides,
  • five times the homicide rate,
  • three times all deaths by firearms and
  • five and a half times as many deaths as are attributed to illegal drug use.

Pistol
Yet we mandate seatbelts in cars by federal law, worry ourselves sick
over firearms and spend $18 billion annually (about a million dollars a
death) on the War on Drugs. We expect to
be at risk if we’re seriously overweight. Cancer might be fatal.
Everyone knows that standing under a lone tree during a thunderstorm is
dangerous. Walking the edge of a highway at night, wearing dark clothes
isn’t a good idea and those who drive drunk have little to complain
about when they hit a tree or, worse yet, another car.
But who expects to go into the hospital with a simple fracture or a tonsillectomy and come out dead?
Bacteriacartoon
We’ve named the killer. He does not stalk the halls unknown and
shrouded in mystery. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
comes to us mostly courtesy of lazy pediatricians and demanding
parents. “Give the kid an antibiotic,”
the siren-call of overuse that lead to the Darwinian development of
drug-resistant strains. In the sixty years since penicillin and other
‘cillins’ commonly used against infection, various bacteria were busy
counting the dead and restructuring the survivors. If that sounds like
a battle-plan, it’s not too much of a stretch.
Voila! Superbug!
Aside from the outright death rate,

(Wikipedia)
patients with MRSA infection had, on average, 3 times the length of
hospital stay, 3 times the total charges ($48,824 vs $14,141), and 5
times the risk of in-hospital death than inpatients without this
infection.

Handwash
Controlling MRSA is amazingly basic to what we used to think of as
standard hospital cleanliness—wash your hands, wash your tools, wash
the floors.

The
disease control agency projected seven years ago that the added annual
cost of treating infected hospital patients was nearly $5 billion. Now
officials there believe it may approach $20 billion, or 1 percent of
the nation’s $2 trillion health care bill. Other experts put the number
above $30 billion.

Of course a billion used to
be a serious buck. These days it’s a number on the way to another
number and otherwise without meaning. Still . . . a death rate of 34%
within 30 days among patients infected with MRSA . . . and it’s not a
pretty death.

Johanna Sullivan Daly, a 63-year-old
Brooklyn woman, developed MRSA and other infections after surgery to
repair a broken shoulder in 2004, said one of her daughters, Maureen J.
Daly. Ms. Daly said that just before her mother’s discharge from a
Manhattan hospital, she watched a doctor remove her dressings with
bare, unwashed hands.

Five days later, her mother developed
intense pain and they went to have her wound examined. “When the
dressing came off,” Ms. Daly said, “I saw this — I can’t describe the
smell, it was the foulest thing — just this greenish fluid coming out
of her arm, oozing and oozing.”

Soon after, her mother developed
a high fever and then lost the ability to move her limbs, Ms. Daly
said. She spent several months on a ventilator before dying in a
nursing home. The hospital bill came to $600,000 for what was to have
been a $40,000 procedure.

$560,000 for covering up their own mistakes and Mrs. Sullivan died in the process. The hospital would offer an alternate reality, no doubt. There would be words like unavoidable and in spite of the best efforts, along with statistically possible. It’s like a Civil-War field hospital out there and there’s no reason for it other than carelessness.
Drrajivjain
We expect restaurant-workers to wash their hands after using the
toilet. Is it too much to expect a doctor to wash in between patients
and use latex gloves as appropriate?

Pittsburgh veterans hospital has found that preventing infection is cost-effective.

Dr.
Rajiv Jain, the hospital’s chief of staff, said its infection control
program cost about $500,000 a year, including test kits, salaries for
three workers and the $175-per-patient expense of gloves, gowns and
hand sanitizer. But the hospital, which has a $431 million budget,
realized a net savings of nearly $900,000 when the number of infected
patients fell, Dr. Jain said.

To say nothing of the patients who went home in a car instead of with a sheet pulled over their face.
It’s typical—understandable, but typical, for hospitals to put a
dollar-value on procedures, even when they’re life saving. For unknown
reasons, life-threatening procedures don’t seem to get similar
scrutiny. Come to think of it, maybe the reasons are not entirely unknown. Someone actually paid Mrs. Sullivan’s $600,000 bill. But that may be about to change.

(ABC
News) Under new rules issued in the beginning of August, Medicare will
no longer pay for the costs of what it considers “preventable”
conditions acquired in the hospital. These include everything from
certain types of hospital-acquired infections, to patients who are
given transfusions with the wrong blood type, to bed sores.

Instead, the hospitals themselves will have to cover these costs (since the rules also prevent them from billing the patient).

Money,
which is rumored to make the world go around, will now make the doctors
do what doctors have been required to do ever since taking the
Hippocratic Oath—do no harm.
___________________________________________________________
Media comment;

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.